Re: Ramadan
#31661
31/10/02 04:15 PM
31/10/02 04:15 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 646 Machu Picchu
Ibno_Rouchd
Member
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 646
Machu Picchu
|
Salut Mervi  : [*]Title of Fatwa : "Swallowing the dust of the road and equivalent in Ramadan "[*]Question of Fatwa : What is the ruling of swallowing the dust of the road and equivalent in Ramadan? [*] Name of Mufti : Sayyed Sabiq
Regarding those things which one could not protect one's self from, such as swallowing one's saliva, the dust of the road, sifting flour and so on are all overlooked we say: Ibn 'Abbas ruling is that: "There is no problem with tasting liquid food or something you wish to purchase." Al-Hassan used to chew the walnuts for his grandson while he was fasting. Ibrahim also permitted that. Chewing gum (unlike the one in vogue in the West, it has no sweetness or fragrance) is disliked. The gum must not break into pieces. Those who say that it is disliked include ash-Sha'bi, anNakha'i, the Hanafiyyah, the Shaf'iyyah, and the Hanbaliyyah. 'Aishah and 'Ata permit chewing, as nothing reaches the stomach and it is just like putting pebbles into one's mouth provided it does not break into parts. If a part of it breaks off and enters the stomach, it will break the fast. Ibn Taimiyyah says: "Smelling perfumes does not harm the fast." Enlarging upon the subject, he says: "As for kohl, injections, drops dropped into the urethra [for medical purposes], and treatment for brain and stomach injuries, there is some dispute among the scholars. Some say that none of these break the fast, some say that all except kohl would break the fast, while others say all except the drops break the fast, or that the kohl or drops do not break the fast but that the rest do." Ibn Taimiyyah continues: "The first opinion on this question is preferred. The most apparent conclusion is that none of them break the fast. The fast is part of the religion of Islam. Both the layman and specialist must be knowledgeable about it. If Allah and His Messenger forbade the preceding actions to the fasting person because they would ruin the fast, then it would have been obligatory upon the Messenger to clarify that fact. If he had done so, his companions would have known about it and would have passed it on to the rest of the Muslims. Since no one has related that not from the Prophet, not with an authentic or a weak hadith, nor in mursal or Musnad form then it must be the case that such acts do not void [the fast]." He also says: "If the ruling is one that would affect everyone or everyday matters, then the Prophet would have clarified it to a general audience...
Mehr unter : Islamonline.net
Wa Allhou A3lam et à revoir ! Ibno_Rouchd
==================================================== "Wer so tut, als bringe er die Menschen zum Nachdenken, den lieben sie. Wer sie wirklich zum Nachdenken bringt, den hassen sie.",A.H ====================================================
|
|
|
|
|
Forums17
Topics18,514
Posts164,843
Members9,959
| |
Most Online12,010 Dec 24th, 2014
|
|
|