Todesstrafe vor Menschenrecht.

Islamische Menschenrechtserklärungen, gleich welcher Herkunft, behalten stets bei, dass die islamische Religion die oberste Autorität darstellt. Sie können daher nur insofern Menschenrechte garantieren, wie der Islam geachtet und seine Prinzipien nicht verletzt werden. Das bedeutet gleichzeitig die Beschränkung der Rechte aller Nichtmuslime.

Daher gilt: Rechte im vollen Umfang genießt im islamischen Gebiet nur der Muslim, denn er ist staatsloyaler Bürger.

Nichtmuslime haben verminderte Rechte, haben aber Existenzberechtigung. Vollkommen verwirkt hat seine Rechte der vom Islam abgefallene Muslim, denn er ist ein Staats- und Landesverräter. Ihm droht bei einer ordentlichen Gerichtsverhandlung oder durch Selbstjustiz seiner muslimischen Nachbarn die Todesstrafe.

Dieses Recht, die Todesstrafe für Abtrünnige vor allen Menschenrechten an die erste Stelle zu setzen, unterstreicht auch der "Entwurf einer islamischen Erklärung der Menschenrechte" der Islamischen Konferenz in Dschidda, Saudi-Arabien, von 1979 9: Einen Abtrünnigen grundsätzlich nicht mit dem Tod zu bestrafen, verstieße ja gegen das islamische Gesetz (sharî'a) und kann daher niemals garantiert werden, auch nicht im Rahmen einer Menschenrechtserklärung.

Schluss: Christen sollten mit einigen Grundlagen des islamischen Toleranzverständnisses vertraut sein. Die Stellung der Christen in der islamischen Welt - eine geduldete Minderheit unter der Bedingung der Einhaltung gewisser Grenzen, aber immer Bürger zweiter Klasse - ist unter Ausleuchtung aller damit verbundenen Benachteiligungen noch viel zu wenig in der westlichen Welt bekannt.

Christen sollten nicht versäumen, wo immer möglich, auf diese Ungleichbehandlung von Christen und Muslimen in der islamischen Welt hinzuweisen, betend für alle Christen einzutreten und ihre Anliegen öffentlich bekannt zu machen.

Das Institut für Islamfragen will der Herausforderung durch die ständige Zunahme der Zahl der Muslime in Europa begegnen und Christen helfen, sich dieser Herausforderung zu stellen.
Dieses evangelische Institut der Lausanner Bewegung Deutschland bietet sachliche Informationen aus christlicher Perspektive vor dem Hintergrund der besonderen Ereignisse unserer Zeit.

Unsere Ziele
· Eine sachlich-wissenschaftliche Beschäftigung mit dem Islam
· Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit dem Anspruch des Islam als Religion, politischem System und Gesellschaftsordnung
· Regelmäßige Veröffentlichungen, Seminare, Vorträge und Tagungen
· Ein zeitgemäßes Vertreten christlicher Werte und Auffassungen
· Zurüstung von Christen zu einer angemessenen Begegnung mit Muslimen

Quelle: Pseudo-islaminstitut.de

-Eine sachlich-wissenschaftliche Beschäftigung mit dem Islam

Auch der heilige Geist5 spielte nach dem Zeugnis des Korans bei der Überbringung des Korans eine
aktive Rolle: "Sprich: Der heilige Geist hat ihn von deinem Herrn mit der Wahrheit herabgesandt,
damit er diejenigen, die glauben, festige, und als Rechtleitung und frohen Botschaft für die Gottergebenen"
(16,102).
Quelle : PseudoKoran Die heilige Schrift des Islam?? laut Von Dr. Christine Schirrmacher

Im Namen Allahs, des Gnädigen, des Barmherzigen.

102. Sprich: « Der Geist der Heiligkeit hat ihn (den Koran) herabgebracht von deinem Herrn mit der Wahrheit, auf daß Er die festige, die da glauben, und zu einer Führung und einer frohen Botschaft für die Gottergebenen.»
Die Biene (An-Nahl) 102

قُلْ نَزَّلَهُ رُوحُ الْقُدُسِ


يَعْنِي جِبْرِيل , نَزَلَ بِالْقُرْآنِ كُلّه نَاسِخه وَمَنْسُوخه . وَرُوِيَ بِإِسْنَادٍ صَحِيح عَنْ عَامِر الشَّعْبِيّ قَالَ : وُكِّلَ إِسْرَافِيل بِمُحَمَّدٍ صَلَّى اللَّه عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ ثَلَاث سِنِينَ , فَكَانَ يَأْتِيه بِالْكَلِمَةِ وَالْكَلِمَة , ثُمَّ نَزَلَ عَلَيْهِ جِبْرِيل بِالْقُرْآنِ . وَفِي صَحِيح مُسْلِم أَيْضًا أَنَّهُ نَزَلَ عَلَيْهِ بِسُورَةِ " الْحَمْد " مَلَك لَمْ يَنْزِل إِلَى الْأَرْض قَطُّ . كَمَا تَقَدَّمَ فِي الْفَاتِحَة بَيَانه .

Quelle: تفسير القرطبي, Tafsir(Erläutung von Quran)von Al Kortibi

فَقَالَ تَعَالَى مُجِيبًا لَهُمْ " قُلْ نَزَّلَهُ رُوح الْقُدُس " أَيْ جِبْرِيل " مِنْ رَبّك بِالْحَقِّ " أَيْ بِالصِّدْقِ وَالْعَدْل " لِيُثَبِّت الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا " فَيُصَدِّقُوا بِمَا أَنْزَلَ أَوَّلًا وَثَانِيًا وَتُخْبَت لَهُ قُلُوبهمْ " وَهُدًى وَبُشْرَى لِلْمُسْلِمِينَ " أَيْ وَجَعَلَهُ هَادِيًا وَبِشَارَة لِلْمُسْلِمِينَ الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا بِاَللَّهِ وَرُسُله .

Quell:تفسير ابن كثير, Tafsir(Erläuterung von Quran)
von Ibno Kathir

THE MULTIPLE BIBLE VERSIONS
It will now be easy for us to analyze a Christian's claim about his Holy Book.

SEPARATING THE WHEAT FROM THE CHAFF

Before we scrutinize the various versions, let us clarify our own belief regarding the Books of God. When we say that we believe in the Tauraat, the Zaboor, the Injeel and the Qur'an, what do we really mean? We already know that the Holy Qur'an is the infallible Word of God, revealed to our Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhummed Mustapha (Peace be upon him) word for word, through the agency of the Archangel Jibraeel, (known as Gabriel in English), and perfectly preserved and protected from human tampering for the past fourteen hundred years! 1 Even hostile critics of Islam have grudgingly vouched for the purity of the Holy Qur’ân: "THERE IS PROBABLY IN THE WORLD NO OTHER BOOK WHICH HAS REMAINED TWELVE CENTURIES (now fourteen) WITH SO PURE A TEXT." — (Sir William Muir)

The Tauraat we Muslims believe in is not the "Torah" of the Jews and the Christians, though the words — one Arabic, the other Hebrew — are the same. We believe that whatever the Holy Prophet Moses (Peace be upon him) preached to his people, was the revelation from God Almighty, but that Moses was not the author of those "books" attributed to him by the Jews and the Christians. 2
Likewise, we believe that the Zaboor was the revelation of God granted to Hazrat Dawood (David) (Peace be upon him), but that the present Psalms associated with his name are not that revelation. The Christians themselves do not insist that David is the sole author of "his" Psalms.3

1. Whether Muslim or non-Muslim, you do not have lo accept this claim on faith alone. You can verify the fact that Al-Qur’ân is the Word of God. See "AL-QURAN- The Miracle of Miracles";

2- More evidence later on — "Moses not the author of the Biblical "Torah."

3.. Later on you’ll read how Christian "Brains Trust" confess — "Author; Principally David, though there are other writers."

What about the Injeel(BIBLE ) ?
INJEEL means the "Gospel" or "good news" which Jesus Christ preached during his short ministry. The "Gospel" writers often mention that Jesus going about and preaching the Gospel ( the Injeel ):

1. "And Jesus went . . . preaching the gospel . . . and healing every disease among the people." (Matthew 9:35)
2. "... but whosoever shall lose his fife for my sake and the gospel's, the same shall save it." (Mark 8:35)
3. "... preached the gospel. . ." (Luke 20:1)

The "gospel" is a frequently-used word, but what Gospel did Jesus preach? Of the 27 books of the New Testament, only a small fraction can be accepted as the words of Jesus. The Christians boast about the Gospels according to St. Matthew, according to St. Mark, according to St. Luke and according to St. John, but there is not a single Gospel "according" to (St.) Jesus himself! We sincerely believe that everything Christ (May the peace and blessings of God be upon him) preached was from God. That was the Injeel, the good news and the guidance of God for the Children of Israel. In his life-time Jesus never wrote a single word, nor did he instruct anyone to do so. What passes off as the "GOSPELS" today are the works of anonymous hands!
The question before us is: "Do you accept that the Bible is God's Word?" The question is really in the form of a challenge. The questioner is not simply seeking enlightenment. The question is posed in the spirit of a debate. We have every right to demand in a similar vein — "Which Bible are you talking about?", we may ask. "Why, there is only ONE Bible!" he mutters.

THE CATHOLIC BIBLE
Holding the "Douay" Roman Catholic Version of the Bible aloft in my hand, I ask, "Do YOU accept THIS Bible as the Word of God?" For reasons best known to themselves, the Catholic Truth Society have published their Version of the Bible in a very short, stumpy form. This Version is a very odd proportion of the numerous Versions in the market today. The Christian questioner is taken aback. "What Bible is that?" he asks. "Why, I thought you said that there was only ONE Bible!" I remind him. "Y-e-s," he murmurs hesitantly, "but what Version is that?" "Why, would that make any difference?" I enquire. Of course it does, and the professional preacher knows that it does. He is only bluffing with his "ONE Bible" claim.
The Roman Catholic Bible was published at Rheims in 1582, from Jerome's Latin Vulgate and reproduced at Douay in 1609. As such the RCV (Roman Catholic Version) is the oldest Version that one can still buy today. Despite its antiquity, the whole of the Protestant world, including the "cults"* condemn the RCV because it contains seven extra "books" which they contemptuously refer to as the "apocrypha" i.e. of DOUBTFUL AUTHORITY. Notwithstanding the dire warning contained in the Apocalypse, which is the last book in the RCV (renamed as "Revelation" by the Protestants), it is "revealed":

". . . If any man shall add to these things (or delete) God shall add unto him the plagues written in this Book." (Revelation 22:18-19)
But who cares! They do not really believe! The Protestants have bravely expunged seven whole books from their Book of God! The outcasts are:
1.The Book of Judith
2.The Book of Tobias
3.The Book of Baruch
4.The Buck of Esther, etc.

* This disparaging title is given by the orthodox to Jehovah's Witnesses, the Seventh Day Adventists and a thousand other sects and denominations with whom they do not see eye to eye.

THE PROTESTANT BIBLE
Sir Winston Churchill has some pertinent things to say about the Authorised Version (AV) of the Protestant Bible, which is also widely known as the "King James Version (KJV)".
"THE AUTHORISED VERSION OF THE BIBLE WAS PUBLISHED IN 1611 BY THE WILL AND COMMAND OF HIS MAJESTY KING JAMES THE 1ST WHOSE NAME IT BEARS TILL TODAY."

The Roman Catholics, believing as they do that the Protestants have mutilated the Book of God, are yet aiding and abetting the Protestant "crime" by forcing their native converts to purchase the Authorised Version (AV) of the Bible, which is the only Bible available in some 1500 languages of the lesser developed nations of the world. The Roman Catholics milk their cows, but the feeding is left to the Protestants! The overwhelming majority of Christians — both Catholics and Protestant — use the Authorised (AV) or the King James Version (KJV) as it is alternatively called.

GLOWING TRIBUTES
First published, as Sir Winston says, in 1611, and then revised in 1881 (RV), and now re-revised and brought up to date as the Revised Standard Version (RSV) 1952, and now again re-re-revised in 1971 (still RSV for short). Let us see what opinion Christendom has of this most revised Bible, the RSV:-

1. "THE FINEST VERSION WHICH HAS BEEN PRODUCED IN THE PRESENT CENTURY." — (Church of England Newspaper)
2. "A COMPLETELY FRESH TRANSLATION BY SCHOLARS OF THE HIGHEST EMINENCE." — (Times literary Supplement)
3. "THE WELL-LOVED CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AUTHORISED VERSION COMBINED WITH A NEW ACCURACY OF TRANSLATION." — (Life and Work)
4. "THE MOST ACCURATE AND CLOSE RENDERING OF THE ORIGINAL" — (The Times)
The publishers (Collins) themselves, in their notes on the Bible at the end of their production, say on page 10: "THIS BIBLE (RSV), IS THE PRODUCT OF THIRTY-TWO SCHOLARS, ASSISTED BY AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPRESENTING FIFTY CO-OPERATING DENOMINATIONS." Why all this boasting? To make the gullible public buy their product? All these testimonies convince the purchaser that he is backing the right horse, with the purchaser little suspecting that he is being taken for a ride.

"THE WORLD'S BEST SELLER"
But what about the Authorised Version of the Bible (AV), the "World's Best Seller?" These Revisers, all good salesmen, have some very pretty things to say about it. However, their page iii, paragraph six of the PREFACE of the RSV reads;
"THE KING JAMES VERSION (alternative description of AV) HAS WITH GOOD REASON BEEN TERMED 'THE NOBLEST MONUMENT OF ENGLISH PROSE.’ ITS REVISERS IN 1881 EXPRESSED ADMIRATION FOR 'ITS SIMPLICITY, ITS DIGNITY, ITS POWER, ITS HAPPY TURNS OF EXPRESSION ... THE MUSIC OF ITS CADENCES, AND THE FELICITIES OF ITS RHYTHM.’ IT ENTERED, AS NO OTHER BOOK HAS, INTO THE MAKING OF THE PERSONAL CHARACTER AND THE PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF THE ENGLISH-SPEAKING PEOPLES. WE OWE TO IT AN INCALCULABLE DEBT."
Can you, dear reader, imagine a more magnificent tribute being paid to the "Book of Books" than the above? I, for one, cannot. Let the believing Christian, now steel himself for the un-kindest blow of all from his own beloved Lawyers of Religion; for in the very same breath they say:
"YET THE KING JAMES VERSION HAS GRAVE DEFECTS." And, "THAT THESE DEFECTS ARE SO MANY AND SO SERIOUS AS TO CALL FOR REVISION . . ." This is straight from the horse's mouth, i.e. the orthodox Christian scholars of "the highest eminence." Another galaxy of Doctors of Divinity are now required to produce an encyclopedia explaining the cause of those GRAVE AND SERIOUS DEFECTS in their Holy Writ and their reasons for eliminating them.

FIFTY THOUSAND ERRORS (?)
The Jehovah's Witnesses in their "AWAKE!" Magazine dated 8 September, 1957, carried this startling headline — " 50000 ERRORS IN THE BIBLE?" (See below for the reproduction).
While I was still formulating the theme of this booklet, I heard a knock at my door one Sunday morning. I opened the door. A European gentleman stood there, grinning broadly. "Good morning'" he said. "Good morning" I replied. He was offering me his "Awake" and "Watchtower" magazines. Yes, a Jehovah's Witness! If a few had knocked at your door previously, you will recognize them immediately. The most supercilious lot of people who ever knocked at people's doors! I invited him in.
As soon as he settled down, I produced the full reproduction of what you see below. Pointing to the monograph at the top of the page, I asked, "Is this your's?" He readily recognised his own. I said, "It says: 50 000 Errors in the Bible, is it true?" "What's that!" he exclaimed. I repeated, "I said, that it says, that there are 50 000 errors in your Bible." "Where did you get that?" He asked. (This was published 23 years ago, when he was perhaps a little nipper) I said, "Leave the fancy talk aside — is this your's?" pointing again to the monograph — "Awake!" He said, "Can I have a look?" "Of course," I said. I handed him the page. He started perusing. They (the Jehovah's Witnesses) are trained. They attend classes five times a week in their "Kingdom Halls." Naturally, they are the fittest missionaries among the thousand -and - one - sects - and - denominations of Christendom. They are taught that when cornered, do not commit yourself to anything, do not open your mouths. Wait for the Holy Ghost to inspire you with what to say.


I silently kept watching him, while he browsed the page. Suddenly he looked up. He had found it. The "Holy Ghost" had tickled him. He began, "The article says that "most of those errors have been eliminated." I asked "If MOST are eliminated, how many remain out of 50000? 5000? 500? 50? Even if 50 remain, do you attribute those errors to God?" He was speechless. He excused himself by suggesting that he will come again with some senior member of his Church. That will be the day!
If I had this booklet ready, I would have offered him, saying — "I would like to do you a favour, give me your name and address, and your telephone number. I will lend you this booklet — IS THE BIBLE GOD'S WORD?" for 90 days. I want a written reply!" If you do this, And a few other Muslims do the same. They and the other missionaries will never darken your doors again. I believe that this publication will prove the most effective talisman to date. Insha-Allah!
This "cult" of Jehovah's Witnesses which is so strong in its condemnation of the orthodox Trinitarians, for playing with the "Word of God," is itself playing the same game of semantic gymnastics. In the article under review — "50000 ERRORS IN THE BIBLE?" — they say: "there are probably 50 000 errors . . . errors that have crept into the Bible text . . . 50000 such serious (?) errors… most of those so-called errors... as a whole the Bible is accurate." (?)
We do not have the time and space to go into the tens of thousands of — grave or minor — defects that the authors of the Revised Standard Version (RSV) have attempted to revise. We leave that privilege to the Christian scholars of the Bible. Here I will endeavour to cast just a cursory glance at a "half-a-dozen" or so of those "minor" changes.
1. "Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign: Behold, a VIRGIN shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel."
(Isaiah 7:14 - AV)

The indispensable "VIRGIN" in the above verse has now been replaced in the RSV with the phrase "a young woman," which is the correct translation of the Hebrew word almah. Almah is the word which has occurred all along in the Hebrew text and NOT bethulah which means VIRGIN. This correction is only to be found in the English language translation, as the RSV is only published in this tongue. For the African and the Afrikaner, the Arab and the Zulu, in fact, in the 1 500 other languages of the world, Christians are made to continue to swallow the misnomer "VIRGIN."

Quelle:Auszüg aus dem Buch
"IS THE BIBLE GODS WORD?"
By Sheikh Ahmed Deedat

To download the full version(word as *.zip) of "IS THE BIBLE GODS WORD? "By Sheikh Ahmed Deedat

was wäre, wenn nicht nur sabeer, sondern mehrere mitglieder gelichzeitig solche postings verbreiteten?

Hier möchte jemand gerne eine Erläuterung zu einer biblischen Stelle unter Angabe einer verlässlichen Originalquelle (hier das AT).

Sara, wie Du Dich fühlst, kann ich gut verstehen. Das ist sicher nicht angenehm.